Filed in archive
Cameras
by Jordan Grodecki on January 18, 2009
After lots of hype in December, the Nikon D3x has finally been reviewed and tested with some serious depth by a certain Thom Hogan. After many complex tests that I don't really understand, he came to the conclusion that it is, most definitely, the camera with the best image quality on the market. However, such quality comes at a serious price, a massice $3000 step up from the D3, where the only real change is the sensor being upped from 12megapixels to 24megapixels!
Is it worth it? If you need the resolution it certainly is, but otherwise...not really.
Permalink: Nikon D3x: It's awesome. It's expensive
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/141491
Addthis
Ask
Blinklist
del.icio.us
Digg
Fark
Facebook
Google
Lycos
Ma.gnolia
Mr Wong
Netscape
Netvousz
Newsvine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Slashdot
Tailrank
Technorati
Wink
Yahoo
Vote for Nikon D3x: It's awesome. It's expensive:
|
Rating: 6.50 out of 4 vote(s) cast.
|
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS |  See all blog subscribe options |
 What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |
