Filed in archive
Photography
by Andrew Garrett on August 13, 2006
As we all know, I'm a fan of digital. Not so much for the technology itself, but for the freedom it offers, for the pure cost benefits whether you're a professional or an enthusiastic hobbyist.
You can try more things, see the results instantly, experiment more freely.
Apparently, the same applies when shooting movies.
How shooting digitally changes acting
"Now there's no film in the camera. You can shoot everything. So there's no rehearsal. Or perhaps it's all rehearsal. Either way, it's far more natural."
Shooting another take has an incremental cost of nothing. Leaving the cameras rolling during a rehearsal costs $0. Why not film it, they might get something absolutely perfect?
The same really applies to photography - why not press the button? It's not like it costs you anything...
Permalink: How the 'Long Tail' changes shooting.
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/31826
Addthis
Ask
Blinklist
del.icio.us
Digg
Fark
Facebook
Google
Lycos
Ma.gnolia
Mr Wong
Netscape
Netvousz
Newsvine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Slashdot
Tailrank
Technorati
Wink
Yahoo
Vote for How the 'Long Tail' changes shooting.:
|
Rating: 8.50 out of 2 vote(s) cast.
|
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS |  See all blog subscribe options |
 What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |
